Overview
Linear is excellent at what it was built for: fast issue triage on sequential work. Ravel is built for everything else — parallel departments, real blockers, mixed completion signals, and teams that are tired of discovering on Thursday that a ticket marked Done was not actually done.
Shipping software forks and merges constantly. Tasks finish through merged PRs, uploaded PDFs, external links, or sign-off — not a single "move to Done" gesture. Ravel models that as a dependency graph from day one, with AI that judges completion and unlocks the next wave automatically.
A real-world example
Imagine a 10-person team shipping a new payments feature. Backend API, frontend UI, security review, and documentation all need to finish before QA can start. In Linear, a PM manually updates blockers, pings three people in Slack, and still finds out on Thursday that the API wasn't actually done — the ticket was just marked Done.
In Ravel, the API task has a completion rule tied to a merged PR. When the PR merges, Ravel marks it complete, unlocks the frontend and security tracks, and notifies the owners — automatically. The PM sees the graph shift, not a stale status.
AI features
In Linear, completion is a human action — someone marks an issue done, moves it to a state, or closes a cycle. That breaks down when dozens of tasks finish through different proof: merged PRs, uploaded specs, vendor links, or review sign-off.
Ravel's built-in AI evaluates task progress against each task's completion rules — GitHub activity for code-backed work, submissions for uploads and links, and defined criteria for other deliverables. When the work meets the bar, Ravel marks the task complete and pushes the graph forward: dependents unlock, owners get notified, and the next wave becomes ready without a status-grooming pass.
Linear's AI assists writing and triage inside a linear workflow. Ravel's AI participates in execution — detecting completion and keeping non-linear flow moving.
Dependencies & critical path
Linear supports blocking links, but the primary experience remains a prioritized list — work is presented as "next up," even when the real constraint is a dependency chain across teams. There is no live critical path and no automatic unlock when blockers clear.
Ravel treats the DAG as the product: parallel tracks stay visible, blocked work stays blocked, and downstream tasks unlock when upstream work genuinely completes. You see why the release is stuck — not just which ticket is at the top of a queue.
The difference shows up mid-sprint — when a platform task slips and three feature tracks should have been idle days ago. Linear shows you tickets; Ravel shows you the broken chain.
Planning workflow
Linear planning centers on issues moving through cycles — strong when scope is small and dependencies are simple. Multi-team releases still require manual breakdown, labels, and project scopes to approximate parallel work.
Ravel starts from intent: describe the goal in natural language and get departments, tasks, and dependencies proposed in minutes. The plan reflects non-linear structure upfront — who runs in parallel, what must finish first, what unlocks next — instead of retrofitting blockers onto a linear queue after kickoff.
Pricing
Linear charges per user, so cost scales with every hire. Ravel is $19/month for the entire workspace — unlimited team members included. For a 10–15 person engineering team, the gap adds up quickly.
Both tools let you try before committing. Ravel includes a 14-day free trial with full AI decomposition and GitHub sync — no credit card required. See the Pricing page for current trial and refund terms.
GitHub & integrations
Linear integrates with GitHub, but merged code does not close the loop — someone still updates issue state by hand. Progress and reality drift apart when "Done" means clicked, not shipped.
Ravel connects to GitHub natively for code-backed tasks: commits and pull requests feed progress, and AI evaluates whether the work matches task scope. Non-code tasks use uploads, links, or other per-task rules — each with its own proof of done, assessed automatically.
Adoption & learning curve
Linear's best experience is the native desktop app — keyboard shortcuts, instant navigation, and the workflow power users expect. Web access exists, but most teams install the Mac, Windows, or mobile client to work efficiently. Every participant learns Linear's issue states, cycles, and triage habits before the tool feels natural.
Ravel is browser-first. Open a link, sign in, and work on the graph — no download for engineering, design, QA, or stakeholders. Task updates, unlock notifications, and risk alerts reach people by email when they are not in the app, so contributors stay in the loop without another desktop client or a crash course in issue taxonomy.
For contractors and cross-functional teammates who touch the sprint briefly, that difference matters: Linear asks them to adopt a tool; Ravel asks them to complete a task.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Ravel | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| AI sprint decomposition | Built-in — goal to graph in minutes | Manual issue breakdown only |
| Dependency graph / critical path | Native DAG with live critical path | Blocking links on a sorted queue — no critical path |
| Flat workspace pricing | $19/mo — whole team included | Per-seat — cost scales with headcount |
| GitHub project sync | Webhook-native — merges feed completion | Integration available — status updated manually |
| Auto task unlock on completion | Automatic when upstream work completes | Manual — dependents stay blocked until someone acts |
| Department / multi-team structure | Departments built at plan time | Teams & projects — structure added by hand |
| AI detects completion & advances status | Yes — PR, upload, link, or custom rules | No — human marks Done on every issue |
| Built for non-linear parallel work | Native DAG — parallel tracks first-class | Linear backlog — sequential queue UX |
| Multi-type completion (code, upload, link) | Per-task rules evaluated by AI | Single workflow — manual status changes |
| Works without installing desktop software | Browser + email notifications | Desktop app required for full workflow |
| Onboarding cost for new members | Open a link — no app install | Learn cycles, states, and desktop shortcuts |
FAQ
Why not just add blockers in Linear?
Blockers on a sorted list still present work as linear. There is no automatic unlock, no critical path, and no proof that "Done" means done. Ravel models parallel departments and completion rules as the default.
How does Ravel know a task is complete without me clicking Done?
Each task has a completion method — PR/commits for code, uploads for files like PDFs, links for external deliverables, or other defined rules. Ravel's AI evaluates progress against that scope, marks the task complete when the bar is met, and unlocks downstream tasks.
Do we need to install anything to use Ravel?
No. Ravel runs in the browser. Team members receive email notifications and open task links without a desktop client — useful for design, QA, and stakeholders who should not install another app.
Does Linear require a desktop app?
Linear has a web app, but most teams install the desktop or mobile client for the keyboard-driven workflow. Ravel is browser-first so the whole workspace can participate without extra software.
When should we stay on Linear?
If your work is truly one-person sequential triage with almost no cross-team dependencies, Linear remains a strong fit. If standups are spent untangling blockers and chasing stale statuses, that is the gap Ravel targets.
How does pricing compare?
Linear charges per user. Ravel is $19/month for the entire workspace regardless of team size — see Pricing for details.
Try Ravel free for 14 days
If your standups sound like "who's blocked on what" — Ravel is worth 14 days of your time. No install, no credit card.
Start free trial